I had originally scheduled a post on this for a couple of weeks ago, but WordPress gained what I will euphemistically call a personality at that time, and the post developed a “critical error” whenever I tried to edit or view it. I kept pushing it back in the hopes of being able to figure out what was the trouble, but the trouble refused to be be figured out. So eventually I just remade the post.
Whether it’s intentional or not, if you ask Dall-E to depict a number of classic video game characters or elements, it’ll show itself to be surprisingly clueless. Here’s what I got from it:
“Mario” here is pretty good. His cultural ubiquity is inescapable.“Mario” again. Why the big M?That M again, and a medkit. That triangle in his teeth disturbs and dismays.Why is Mario always carrying things?“Pac-Man maze” is pretty bad. None of them even has the classic colors.The compugremlins siad, let’s just plaster Pac-Man on it and call it a day.“Pac-Man maze” More like pie-chart manPac-Man is either eating a pizza, or the planet Mars“Q*bert pyramid” is pretty bad in all its forms.At least it got right the idea it was supposed to be depicting geometric shapes.I have no idea where it got “ARETT”The worst “Q*bert pyramid.”This is supposed to be “Q*bert” himself.Also “Q*bert.” This has to be intentional, like they scrubbed all images of the ‘bert from its data.“Q*bert,” imagined I guess as an advertising mascot for a particularly unsatisfying brand of cracker.This “Q*bert” could be interpreted as a video game character, but it’s definitely not Q*bert.“Donkey Kong” consistently produced the worst results. All of them donkeys, none of them monkeys. This one’s an alcoholic.“Donkey Kong.” They could scrub their input of all DK images, but not Getty’s image collection?The least-chosen Warhammer 40K figure.Also, somehow, “Donkey Kong.”“Atari Centipede” is a centipede with a microchip theme, four times in a row.That’s kind of disturbing.Maybe slightly better?Centipede, or fish bones?“Pac-Man” here is pretty disturbing.“Pac-Man,” facing forwardThe worst “Pac-Man” result. How does it even?And “Pac-Man” once more, imagined as a beetle cyclops staring myopically at a pair of conjoined jellybeans.This is what I got for entering my description of that previous item. It’s not a cyclops, and the jellybeans aren’t conjoined, but it’s recognizably a beetle at least.
