White_Pointer Gaming Examines All the SNES Graphic Modes

White_Pointer Gaming’s series examining how different graphic tricks were pulled off in 8- and 16-bit games has been great, and now they have a video going over all eight (Modes 0-7) of the SNES background modes. (42 minutes)

In brief:

Mode 0: Up to four independently movable backgrounds, but with some pretty serious color limitations. Mostly got used for title screens.

Mode 1: Up to three backgrounds, two with more colors. The SNES’s most-used mode.

Mode 2: Two backgrounds, with “offset per tile” on one of them that lets the system move columns of tiles vertically by arbitrary amounts. Used for certain special effects, like (along with raster-based scanline placement) the waving flag in Battlemaniacs, Super Turrican 2’s worms and rockets stages and Panel de Pon/Tetris Attack’s rising game boards. Horizontal offset per tile was also possible, but much less used due to the coarseness of the scroll.

Mode 3: Two backgrounds, one of them gets either 256 colors or, using direct color, being able to specify colors without palettes, with 8 bits of RGB value. Often used for high-color stills. Earthbound’s “THE WAR AGAINST GIYGAS!” screen uses it.

Mode 4: Has the high color first layer of Mode 3, and the offset-per-tile effect from Mode 2 for its second layer (which has fewer colors than in Mode 3). Rarely used. Puzzle Bobble uses it for gameplay, to independently shift the playfields from the rest of the gackground.

Mode 5: Two backgrounds, with 16 and 4 colors per tile respectively, but supports high resolution with 512 pixels per scanline. Can’t do transparency (but can kind of fake it with dithering). Notably, the high res menu screens in Secret of Mana use this.

Mode 6: Only one layer, hi-res like the second layer in Mode 5, but supporting offset-per-tile. Often considered completely unused, White_Pointer Gaming found out that Lufia 2: Rise of the Sinistrals does use it during the credits.

Mode 7: The famous mode that supports scaling, shearing and rotation of a single background layer, used for special effects and fancy 3D effects in games like F-Zero, Pilotwings and Super Mario Kart. Supports 256 paletted colors or direct 8-bit RGB color.

Notably though, Mode 7 can’t actually do 3D effects on its own; it has to use another feature called HDMA. It uses a raster effect to change the horizontal scale of the background on each scanline. As it turns out, the calculations to do this on each line are substantial, which is probably why so many games that use Mode 7 to a significant degree use one of the SNES’ coprocessor chips, like the DSP or SA-1, to help the processor out. The video then rounds out with a discussion of the Mosaic function used in such places as the map transitions in Super Mario World and Final Fantasy IV (II).

Elsewhere, Retro Game Mechanics Explained did a 16-part series covering the SNES’ hardware feature in considerable depth.

DiggDead

We’re a gaming site sure, but I think our broader focus is on using computers for entertainment purposes, and it’s not as if sites like Digg and its aggregation successor Reddit don’t gameify their workings to a significant extent, what with the reputation and the karma and the scoring and whatnot.

Digg has been restarted before, in fact several times! Some history is called for here.

A Timeline of Digg’s Several Graves

2004 Digg is launched, let’s call this Digg 1
2005 Reddit is launched; at first it’s much the underdog
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 “Digg v4” happens, a badly handled redesign (I call it Digg 2), a mass exodus to Reddit begins
2011
2012 Digg’s traffic has fallen by 90%; Digg redesigns again (Digg 3), changing over to entirely editorially-curated content; Digg’s IP is sold in two chunks
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018 Digg’s remaining assets are sold to a company called “BuySellAds,” which should give you some indication of where their priorities lay; later it’s sold to the even more hilariously evilly-named “Money Group”; Digg 4
2019 Lemmy, a Fediverse alternative to sites like Reddit and Digg, is launched
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025 June: Digg relaunched in private beta, Digg 5 why not
2026 January: Digg goes public; March: then is taken offline yet again a couple of months later

Yes, Digg is a year older than Reddit, and yes, at first it was the obvious frontrunner. Nowadays Reddit could definitely stand to have some more challengers, but it looks like it’s not going to come from Digg, at least not in the near future.

I got in near the end of Digg’s private beta. I think I was one of its more prolific commenters, and I had considered starting a SetSideB community there. Ha ha, I’m glad I didn’t now! There were people on Digg making concerted efforts trying to push it rightward, trying to spread the meme that Reddit, the very site that once hosted TheDonald, was somehow far left-leaning. I’d tell you more about their odious arguments, but I blocked them as soon as I noticed them. Digg had good block button, at least.

There had been problems with AI bots trying to push content, yes, but Digg also used made a lot of use of AI itself. Moderation was handled partly by algorithm, and many pages would have Digg-generated AI summaries, marked “tl;dr.” I came to resent them.

A BusinessWeek cover, archived by Wikipedia, from Digg’s heyday

Original co-founder Kevin Rose, in many ways the face of Digg, is back on board. He seems to come back every time they’re having problems, but never seems to stay for long. Digg’s apology message, which is now their entire website, came suddenly. We users were given absolutely no advance warning, the site, and all of our posts and comments and votes, were just gone entirely. Here one moment, gone the next. Good job there Rose.

I don’t think it’s right to say, as the front page now does, that “[t]he internet is now populated, in meaningful part, by sophisticated AI agents and automated accounts.” That is true if you view it in terms of posters. But the web is mostly comprised of readers. One of Digg’s early ideas, lifted somewhat from Slashdot, was that users with good posts get more influence. That also became Digg’s downfall, as power users with high influence banded together to upvote each other’s posts, making themselves more and more powerful within that framework.

I wonder if AI agents could be used by nefarious actors to automate gaming such a system? I don’t know. At a certain point, the problems with a system start to look, not like fixable problems, but like inherent flaws. But anyway, my fondness is still for entirely human-curated sites, like my favorite hangout spot Metafilter. It certainly has problems, but it doesn’t have a runaway bot problem, or at least none that I’ve noticed so far.

Please support the human-made web. The whole online world depends on it. Thank you.

MARCHintosh 2026

I feel like I’m a bit late on this one, but there’s still two weeks of March left. Some crazy wonderful people every year devote the month of March to classic Macintosh stuff, both hardware and software, and primarily things before the release of OS/X in 2001. The original MacOS traces its lineage all the way back to 1984’s original Macintoshes, and existed as Apple’s primary OS for 17 years. Now it’s been 24 years since the switchover, but a lot of people still like the system that served as Apple’s mainline OS for so long.

MARCHintosh has a website that organizes it, and even offers a style guide. It was created as a fruit-flavored adjunct of similar month-long pun-inspired retrocomputing celebrations DOScember (website currently down for a redesitn) and SepTANDY (doesn’t seem to have a home site at all). Should there be more? VICtober? JUNIX (thanx Ben Zuddist)? I vote yes, regardless of how terrible the pun is! Let’s fill the year with crackling, smoking old tech!

There is lots to find exploring the hashtag #marchintosh, this is just a few items. Level 2 Jeff emulated the original Macintosh on a microcontroller (15 minutes):

Michael MJD emulated Windows on a PowerPC Mac (32 minutes, but running, it should be said, OS/X, not classic MacOS):

Retro Repair Roundup did an hour-long video where they talked about old Macs:

It’s from back in 2019, but Ron’s Computer Videos showed off a Mystery Science Theater 3000 Hypercard stack! (1 hour 16 minutes) They have a whole MARCHintosh playlist too.

More MARCHintosh projects can be found through the #marchintosh tag on Bluesky and Mastodon.

MacOS Timeline

1976 Founding of Apple Computer (now Apple Inc.), release of Apple I
1977 Release of Apple II
.
. 6 years
.
1984 System 1, release of the original Macintosh
1985
1986 Systems 24 (sometime between 1985 and here)
1987 System 5
1988 System 6
1989
1990
1991 System 7, a.k.a. MacOS 7.6
1992
1993
1994 Switchover to PowerPC hardware
1995
1996
1997 MacOS 8
1998 Initial release of iMac, the beginning of the revival of Apple’s fortunes
1998 MacOS 9
1999
2000
2001 Mac OS/X 10.0 Cheetah (“OS 10,” now called MacOS), initial release of iPod
.
. 24 years
.
2026 Today

Code Adventures: Simulating One Handed Solitaire

My style in titling these things is to just present the subject on whatever it is I’m linking to in the title, so you might expect that this is about someone else doing that and me reporting on it. But no! This time it’s something I did myself!

First, you have to know of a card game called One Handed Solitaire, as reported by Metafilter member ChurchHatesTucker here. CHT’s been on a tear in presenting various card games lately, here’s the other recent posts they’ve made on solitaire card games, with a dungeon crawl flavor: Clear the Dungeon, Tomb of the Four Kings, Scoundrel.

One Handed Solitaire is very simple, and an example of a “zero player game.” There are no decisions to make; winning or losing is completely down to the initial state of the deck. Here are the rules in text:

You start with a shuffled deck of cards. Draw four to form your hand. Your hand is considered to be in sequence, you must keep them in the order drawn. Now:

  • If the first and fourth cards are the same suit, discard the second and third cards from your hand out of play. This of course moves the fourth card to be the second card.
  • If the first and fourth cards are the same rank, discard the first four cards from your hand.
  • If neither of these things are true, draw another card from the deck to the front of your hand. This makes a new first card, and changes which the fourth card is.
  • When the deck runs out and you can no longer remove cards, the game is over. If you clear your hand and there’s still cards in the deck you’re not done, draw four more.

Your score (lower is better) is how many cards are in your hand when you run out of deck and can no longer discard cards. The average score is about 13.32 cards left. If you get a score of zero, that is you discard all of the cards from your hand and the deck is empty, you win.

Here are the rules demonstrated by Gather Together Games in a Youtube video (1Âľ minutes):

ChurchHatesTucker ran a simulation of 200,000 runs and found the win rate of the game is close to 0.7%. I ran my own simulation, in a Python script, and found that out as well. I’ll put my code at the end of this post. No AI was used in its writing, and permission is not given to use it to train AIs. In fact, that’s true of all the text in this blog.

My first attempt found a win rate of 0.94%, but that turns out to be because I left out the aces from the deck! I tried a run with only 20 cards in the deck the 2-6 of each suit, and the win rate became about 7.5%.

If you want to try yourself, here’s the Python code I used. If you have Python installed, just paste it into a text file, give it the extension .py, and run it. It assumes you’re running it in a Linux or other Unix-like system; if you’re on Windows, you might have to change the “shebang” line at the front to point to where your Python is.

#!/usr/bin/python
import random

def draw(deck):
if len(deck) > 0:
return deck.pop(0)
else:
return None

def gameend(deck, hand, verbose):
score = len(hand)
if verbose >= 1:
print("Deck exhaused. Final score:",score)
if score == 0:
print("Win!")
if verbose >= 2:
print("Deck state:",deck)
print("Hand state:",hand)
return score

def play(verbose = 0):
deck = ["2H","3H","4H","5H","6H","7H","8H","9H","TH","JH","QH","KH","AH",
"2D","3D","4D","5D","6D","7D","8D","9D","TD","JD","QD","KD","AD",
"2C","3C","4C","5C","6C","7C","8C","9C","TC","JC","QC","KC","AC",
"2S","3S","4S","5S","6S","7S","8S","9S","TS","JS","QS","KS","AS"]
hand = []
random.shuffle(deck)
for a in range(4):
hand.append(draw(deck))
if verbose >= 3:
print("Game starting--")
while True:
if len(hand) < 4:
drawcard = draw(deck)
if drawcard == None:
return gameend(deck, hand, verbose)
if verbose >= 2:
print("Drew a",drawcard)
hand.insert(0, drawcard)
continue
cardtop = hand[0]
cardfourth = hand[3]
if verbose >= 3:
print("********: Deck length:",len(deck), "Hand length:",len(hand))
if verbose >= 2:
print("CARDS:", cardtop, cardfourth)
# case 1: if the 1st and 4th cards match suit, discard the second and third cards
if cardtop[1] == cardfourth[1]:
d1 = hand.pop(1)
d2 = hand.pop(1)
if verbose >= 2:
print("Discarded",d1,"and",d2)
continue
# case 2: if the 1st and 4th cards match rank, discard the top four
if cardtop[0] == cardfourth[0]:
d1 = hand.pop(0)
d2 = hand.pop(0)
d3 = hand.pop(0)
d4 = hand.pop(0)
if verbose >= 2:
print("Discarded:",d1,d2,d3,d4)
continue
# case 3: if neither is true, draw a card
drawcard = draw(deck)
if drawcard == None:
return gameend(deck, hand, verbose)
else:
if verbose >= 2:
print("Drew a card")
hand.insert(0, drawcard)
# end of loop

if __name__ == "__main__":
numgames = 10000000
wins = 0
scores = []
scoresum = 0
for count in range(numgames):
score = play(verbose = 0)
scores.append(score)
scoresum += score
if score == 0:
wins += 1
#print("A win on game #",count+1)
if count % 500000 == 0:
print("Played",count,"games...")
print("Finished playing",numgames,"games")
print("Wins:",wins)
print("Win rate:",wins/numgames)
print("Total score:",scoresum)
print("Average score:",scoresum/numgames)
print("Run compete.")

Sundry Sunday: Earthbound x They Might Be Giants Musical Mashup

Sundry Sunday is our weekly feature of fun gaming culture finds and videos, from across the years and even decades.

Maybe it’s weird this has never happened before. Both Earthbound and TMBG are both very weird and fun musically, after hearing this mashup of the two it’s surprising how well the two go together.

And I’m not sure which I should be more embarrassed about, that I know all these Earthbound songs so well, or that I know a good four-fifths of the They Might Be Giants tunes from these excellent mixtures from idiokiot (25 minutes).

The dislike for me here is the title, since Earthbound is so much more than “beating Giygas,” but I admit it’s a pretty good match of TMBG’s name.

The History of Game Player’s Magazines

The Video Game History Foundation has a breezy 3½ minute video about one of the less-remembered magazines of the NES-through-Playstation era, Game Player’s, with the apostrophe-S at the end. But it wasn’t just one magazine. Over ten years they put out magazines under thirteen different titles, and surprisingly, one still survives today as PC Gamer, a fact of its history that even their own website seems not to know.

They say that they have now managed to obtain the complete run of all the issues of the Game Player’s series, and all but one of them can now be browsed online, including Game Player’s Sports For Kids, which wasn’t about video games at all.

I remember Game Player’s as being the least of the game periodicals of the time, without the insider’s angle of Nintendo Power, the gonzo enthusiasm of Electronic Gaming Monthly or the slightly highbrow air of Video Games & Computer Entertainment. Yet it seems to have done quite well for itself.

The main fact I remember about Game Player’s was idly reading through the colophon one day (I was a weird kid) and seeing a familiar name: Richard Mansfield! I don’t remember what his capacity there was, but I do remember his days at Compute! and Compute’s Gazette, and that he wrote a couple of books on machine language for the Commodore 64. I always felt that Game Player’s must have felt like a step down for him. I hope he’s still around, out there somewhere, enjoying the current revival of interest in 8-bit computing.

Fedi Games

A brief post on a brief find. I was wondering if anyone thought of using the Fediverse, that nebulous internet thing that includes Mastodon, Lemmy, Peertube, Loops, Pixelfed, Hubzilla, Miskey, Fundwhale and more, and used it as an interface to game software. The main thing I’ve found so far is this site, games.rerere.org.

A very simple interface, but maybe this is only the beginning?

On this site you can start games of Tic-Tac-Toe, Rock Paper Scissors and something called Bunkers, which on quick inspection appears to be an implementation of Scorched Earth. You start a game by sending out a Mastodon message to the game’s address. I haven’t tried any of them yet, so there’s a chance that these will just catch fire and burn down your house if you try them. That’s a thing that can happen, right?

Gamefinds: enclose.horse

We love it when we find weird and unique indie games to tell you all about! Our alien friends to the left herald these occasions.

Less a game than a puzzle, and not so much runnable software than a website, enclose.horse is a very nice thing to spend a few minutes of your day, each day, on.

Every puzzle is a map of a field, with an arrangement of lakes and a horse somewhere in it. You have a number of square blocks to try to completely surround the horse. The horse does not like to be surrounded (click on them to get their opinion), so the more space you can enclose the horse within the higher your score.

When the horse is surrounded, a field of wheat springs up to show you how much space you’ve left the horse. Each space of wheat is one point. Some puzzles have cherries on the map, and also enclosing those is worth five bonus points. There’s also Golden Apples, they’re worth ten points. There’s bees too, trapping the horse with those is five points off your score. And there are pairs of portals, which count as an additional avenue of escape for Horsie that you must also account for.

This is not the perfect solution to today’s enclose.horse puzzle. Can you see how it could be improved?

The puzzles vary in difficulty. It’s usually easy to score at least something, but your true aim is for an optimal, perfect score. When you submit your score (you only get one try!) you’re told what the perfect score is and shown a solution that earns it. You can also browse past puzzles and see how well you do at those, create your own with a simple editor, and play other users’ puzzles.

The site continues to be worked on. Up until a couple of days ago there was a Check button, that you could use to find out what a puzzle’s perfect score was, so you could keep trying until you achieved it. However that introduced a bit of reluctance to submit anything that wasn’t perfection (it certainly made me a lot less likely to submit a score), so in the past couple of days it was removed, and that was probably for the best.

Give it a shot, while it’s harder than you’d think, it’s also not usually very hard. I think you’ll like it.

enclose.horse (web, $0)

Time Extension Rates All the Shining Games

The Shining series, published by Sega but developed by lots of different people, is all over the map regarding gameplay styles. I’d say that more people have heard of the second game, the great Shining Force (it’s sort of like lighter Fire Emblem with town scenes and no permadeath) than the first one, Shining in the Darkness (a first-person dungeon step-oriented crawl with premade characters). All the games are set in a fantasy world (but not all necessarily the same fantasy world) and have a cartoony art style that helps keep things lively, but beyond the dungeon crawls and tactical battles there have been Diablo-style combat, action RPGs, Zelda-style exploration with bump combat, more general strategy and even a fighting game.

Ashley Day at Time Extension rated all 23 of them, and their opinions seem pretty decent to me. So you know, #1 was Shining Force III (the infamous one released on three sold-separate Saturn disks, of which only one made it to the US), #2 was Shining Force II, and #3 was the confusingly-titled “Shining the Holy Ark” also in Saturn. #5 is Shining Force I, and #4 is its GBA remake. Many of the lower-placed games on the list are various later installments, which is fair. The Shining games seem like they’ve fallen off lately, but it’s not like you can’t go back and play the originals… through some, um, means or other….

(Axe smashes through door.) Heeeeres… Ashley Day! Does Stephen King know of these games?

Multiink Monday 3/26/2026

My first Multilink Monday of the year, my concession that I have way too many tabs in my “Set Side B” group and I have to do something to clean them out. Hopefully at least one of these things will hit the right atoms in your brain to induce pleasure, or “trigger dopamine,” in the words and thoughts of a legion of hack game designers. Aid I don’t mean the good kind of Hack either. Let us begin!

  • Your AI Slop Bores Me is a terrific little game where you can enter a prompt for a bit of text or a drawing, and then it’s randomly assigned to someone else viewing the other tab to fulfill the prompt. Answering a question (in whatever way) awards you “tokens” that you can spend to enter more prompts.
  • Hackaday has an article about one bright hacker’s work to restore the Wii’s pizza channel (which was never released in the US) so it can order from Dominos.
  • Finally this is a bit of a selflink but hey, we’re not on Metafilter here are we? An online friend named GothPanda has created a modest little Yahoo-like web directory called Neato!, and I’ve been contributing links to it. We’re up to 63! I’m signed on as a “guide,” so if you contribute links to it with the Add link, I’ll have a look at them and consider adding them! But be warned, this is not a site to stick your SEO links! Nyaah!

Sundry Sunday: King Dedede Teaches Kirby Chess

Sundry Sunday is our weekly feature of fun gaming culture finds and videos, from across the years and even decades.

It’s a pretty light one today. Mashed is an animation channel that presents videos from many different creators. Sometimes they’re good and sometimes, eh. This one’s okay, I think, where the Penguin King of Dreamland challenges Kirby to the latest in a long series of rivalries, this time, a chess match. Except Kirby has the mental age of two, so first, he has to learn how to play. (6 minutes)

What would a Kirby chess game look like? We will probably never know. The era of playful commercial chess programs is probably at its end, sadly, now that there are available real chess programs that can give grandmasters a run for their respective monies. It’s fun to speculate though.